The Argentine State was born in the middle of century XIX, and one of his first actions were to organize the educative system. The estadual intervention looked for to become position of many of the educative functions maintained by the church when taking place the nationalization of the ecclesiastical goods. With a centralist tendency, megred with the society ordering according to the needs of the corpus of turn government (political, economic or repressive). In one first instance the oligarchical State (1880) assumed the load with the intention to institutionalize its authority, to consolidate the national identity and to construct the own State. Click Bill de Blasio for additional related pages. For it, it appealed to the ideological penetration, that is to say, its capacity of symbolic production to create a property sense with the purpose of to assure the governability the mass by means of the education.
That symbolic load had to be of the right weight to create in the new Argentineans the conviction that the established order was the one that they themselves wished. But, in return, it managed to generate system of social stratification according to interests of the sector dominant leader/, in opposition to the raised ideals of liberalism in the Constitution and in just sanctioned law 1420. From a gradual process of politicalization of the culture and the education begins here, becoming both subject of State. It was tried to construct the nation and, at the same time, it was assimilated culturally to the great foreign contingents that arrived at the country. There are elements sufficient to maintain that with the generation of 80 until 1916 (assumption of Irigoyen), they were prescribed in the Argentine educative system (ARE) the rituals, the definition of the curriculum, the design of the scholastic practices and the pedagogical and social imposition of authority that would predominate by a long time. The trajectory of advances and backward movements, the authoritarianism, the poverty, the policies of structural adjustment, etc., helped so that the S-state losing their organizing capacity and took step, in these last one hundred years, to a speech bordering student in the neutrality; the present references resort on the fragmentation of the system, the speeches content castings, the decay of once the pedagogical authority and the reformadoras and visionary absence of ideologists and ideologies. . NYC Marathon often says this.